ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Optical anisotropy measurement in normal and cancerous tissues: backscattering technique.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controlled angular correlations and polarization speckle in scattering birefringent films.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anisotropic light propagation in human brain white matter.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Organoid bioprinting to pattern the matrix microenvironment.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Reflectance spectroscopy: a non-invasive strategy to explore skin reactions to topical products.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Review
- Multi-contrast digital histopathology of mouse organs using quantitative phase imaging and virtual staining.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Increased extracellular matrix stiffness accompanies compromised bladder function in a murine model of radiation cystitis.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Optical characterization of the liver tissue affected by fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma based on internal filters of laser-induced fluorescence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating the deformation of tissue architecture is one of the most important clinical methods for cancer diagnosis. Optical methods are now widely developed for rapid, precise, and real-time assessment of these alterations at the microscopic scale. One of the proposed methods is enhanced backscattering (EBS) technique that allows in-vivo measurement of the optical scattering characteristics. Here, EBS technique is employed to evaluate the optical anisotropy of human epithelial tissues as a measure to distinguish between normal and cancerous one. Orientation dependence of the mean scattering length is assessed in healthy and cancerous tissues of five different human organs i. e. uterus, bladder, colon, kidney, and liver. Helicity preserving channel and rotating ground glass diffuser are utilized to eliminate the polarization induced anisotropy and the background speckle noises respectively. Analysis of the backscattering cones recorded by a high-resolution CCD camera reveals the modification of the strength and degree of optical anisotropy in different tissues during cancer progression. Pathology data affirm the correlation between the experimental results and the morphological alteration of the epithelial cells in each carcinoma type. In general, tissues with fibrous constructional cells are subject to a decrease in anisotropy due to cancer, whereas those with cuboidal cells experience an increase in anisotropy. This complementary information enhances the potency of the EBS technique as a fast, non-destructive, and easily accessible tool for real-time tissue diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.