ArticleBiomedical optics express2020
Spinning disk-remote focusing microscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-immersion oblique plane microscope (miOPM): a reconfigurable platform for high-resolution light-sheet fluorescence microscopy.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Automated measurement of cardiomyocyte monolayer contraction using the Exeter Multiscope.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Multi-immersion Oblique Plane Microscope (miOPM): A reconfigurable platform for high-resolution Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Fast and light-efficient remote focusing for volumetric voltage imaging.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Alignment and characterization of remote-refocusing systems.Applied optics · 2023Article
- Recent advances in oblique plane microscopy.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Sensitivity of remote focusing microscopes to magnification mismatch.Journal of microscopy · 2022Article
- DaXi-high-resolution, large imaging volume and multi-view single-objective light-sheet microscopy.Nature methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast confocal imaging was achieved by combining remote focusing with differential spinning disk optical sectioning to rapidly acquire images of live samples at cellular resolution. Axial and lateral full width half maxima less than 5 µm and 490 nm respectively are demonstrated over 130 µm axial range with a 256 × 128 µm field of view. A water-index calibration slide was used to achieve an alignment that minimises image volume distortion. Application to live biological samples was demonstrated by acquiring image volumes over a 24 µm axial range at 1 volume/s, allowing for the detection of calcium-based neuronal activity in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.