ReviewSAGE open medicine2020
A review of big data and medical research.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Value of Applying Big Data Analytics in Health Supply Chain Management.F1000Research · 2024Pooled it
- Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Pool Data from Meta-Analysis for the Prediction of Countermovement Jump Improvement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Anonymization and visualization of health data and biomarkers.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Uncontrolled Asthma and Severe COVID-19: A Prospective Bidirectional Risk Analysis.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Representativeness of a German AI-enabled data network for secondary epidemiological analysis based on electronic health records.PloS one · 2026Article
- Assessment of the Representation of Civil Servants as the General Population in Terms of Health Checkup Data.Cureus · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in preclinical epilepsy research: Current state, potential, and challenges.Epilepsia open · 2025Review
- Learning health system strategies in the AI era.npj health systems · 2025Review
- BifurcatoR: A Framework for Revealing Clinically Actionable Signal in Variance Masquerading as Noise.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Augmenting maternal clinical cohort data with administrative laboratory dataset linkages: a validation study.Discover health systems · 2025Article
- Detection of Disease Features on Retinal OCT Scans Using RETFound.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Gynecomastia Surgery in 4996 Male Patients Over 14 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Trends, Predictive Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- New horizons in prediction modelling using machine learning in older people's healthcare research.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Introducing Attribute Association Graphs to Facilitate Medical Data Exploration: Development and Evaluation Using Epidemiological Study Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Big Data Research on Severe Asthma.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Research collaboration data platform ensuring general data protection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Practical Guide to Evaluating and Using Big Data in Digestive Disease Research.Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Appraising Unmet Needs and Misinformation Spread About Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in 85,872 YouTube Comments Over 12 Years: Big Data Infodemiology Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universally, the volume of data has increased, with the collection rate doubling every 40 months, since the 1980s. "Big data" is a term that was introduced in the 1990s to include data sets too large to be used with common software. Medicine is a major field predicted to increase the use of big data in 2025. Big data in medicine may be used by commercial, academic, government, and public sectors. It includes biologic, biometric, and electronic health data. Examples of biologic data include biobanks; biometric data may have individual wellness data from devices; electronic health data include the medical record; and other data demographics and images. Big data has also contributed to the changes in the research methodology. Changes in the clinical research paradigm has been fueled by large-scale biological data harvesting (biobanks), which is developed, analyzed, and managed by cheaper computing technology (big data), supported by greater flexibility in study design (real-world data) and the relationships between industry, government regulators, and academics. Cultural changes along with easy access to information via the Internet facilitate ease of participation by more people. Current needs demand quick answers which may be supplied by big data, biobanks, and changes in flexibility in study design. Big data can reveal health patterns, and promises to provide solutions that have previously been out of society's grasp; however, the murkiness of international laws, questions of data ownership, public ignorance, and privacy and security concerns are slowing down the progress that could otherwise be achieved by the use of big data. The goal of this descriptive review is to create awareness of the ramifications for big data and to encourage readers that this trend is positive and will likely lead to better clinical solutions, but, caution must be exercised to reduce harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.