ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Machine learning approach to predict medication overuse in migraine patients.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in headache medicine: between automation and the doctor-patient relationship. A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction models for treatment response in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction models for identifying medication overuse or medication overuse headache in migraine patients: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Pooled it
- Breaking the medication overuse headache cycle: from nociplastic pain mechanisms to patient-centered interventions - the Junior Editorial Board vision.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Prediction of medication overuse in patients with migraine using cox regression and machine learning: a real-world cohort.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in migraine: a narrative review on the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
- A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- The Emerging Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Wearable Devices in Headache: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Functional Disability and Psychological Impact in Headache Patients: A Comparative Study Using Conventional Statistics and Machine Learning Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Preliminary exploration of metabolomics mechanisms in patients with patent foramen ovale and migraine.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2024Article
- Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Headache Field.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Headache Disorder Diagnosis, Classification, and Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- The Ethical Stewardship of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Pain and Headache: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Migraine headache (MH) classification using machine learning methods with data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in Migraine.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Feasibility and Usability of a Mobile App-Based Interactive Care Plan for Migraine in a Community Neurology Practice: Development and Pilot Implementation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Intelligent Digital Twins for Personalized Migraine Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is largely used to develop automatic predictors in migraine classification but automatic predictors for medication overuse (MO) in migraine are still in their infancy. Thus, to understand the benefits of ML in MO prediction, we explored an automated predictor to estimate MO risk in migraine. To achieve this objective, a study was designed to analyze the performance of a customized ML-based decision support system that combines support vector machines and Random Optimization (RO-MO). We used RO-MO to extract prognostic information from demographic, clinical and biochemical data. Using a dataset of 777 consecutive migraine patients we derived a set of predictors with discriminatory power for MO higher than that observed for baseline SVM. The best four were incorporated into the final RO-MO decision support system and risk evaluation on a five-level stratification was performed. ROC analysis resulted in a c-statistic of 0.83 with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.69 and 0.87, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.87 when MO was predicted by at least three RO-MO models. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that the derived RO-MO system could effectively predict MO with ORs of 5.7 and 21.0 for patients classified as probably (3 predictors positive), or definitely at risk of MO (4 predictors positive), respectively. In conclusion, a combination of ML and RO - taking into consideration clinical/biochemical features, drug exposure and lifestyle - might represent a valuable approach to MO prediction in migraine and holds the potential for improving model precision through weighting the relative importance of attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.