Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Comparing Hydraulics Between Two Grapevine Cultivars Reveals Differences in Stomatal Regulation Under Water Stress and Exogenous ABA Applications.

Silvina Dayer, Johannes D Scharwies, Sunita A Ramesh, Wendy Sullivan, Franziska C Doerflinger, Vinay Pagay, Stephen D Tyerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Abscisic Acid Mediates Drought and Salt Stress Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvina DayerSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Johannes D ScharwiesSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Sunita A RameshSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Wendy SullivanSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Franziska C DoerflingerSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Vinay PagaySchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
Stephen D TyermanSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydraulics of plants that have different strategies of stomatal regulation under water stress are relatively poorly understood. We explore how root and shoot hydraulics, stomatal conductance (

Indexed as

aquaporingas exchangehydraulic conductivityisohydricisohydrodynamicplasma membrane intrinsic proteintonoplast intrinsic proteinVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID32636852
PMCPMC7316991
OpenAlexW3036388420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.