Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636823›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

A Humanized Diet Profile May Facilitate Colonization and Immune Stimulation in Human Microbiota-Colonized Mice.

Isabel Moreno-Indias, Randi Lundberg, Lukasz Krych, Stine Broeng Metzdorff, Witold Kot, Dorte Bratbo Sørensen, Dennis Sandris Nielsen, Camilla Hartmann Friis Hansen, Axel K Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Fecal microbial transplants as investigative tools in cancer.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The microbiome and rodent models of immune mediated diseases.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Moreno-IndiasSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Randi LundbergSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lukasz KrychDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stine Broeng MetzdorffSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Witold KotDepartment of Plant and Environmental Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorte Bratbo SørensenSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dennis Sandris NielsenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla Hartmann Friis HansenSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Axel K HansenSection of Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of the importance of the use of gnotobiotic mice for human fecal transfer, colonization efficiency and immune stimulation after human microbiota inoculation in mice are poorly studied compared to mouse microbiota inoculation. We tested the colonization efficiency and immune responses in mice bred for one additional generation after inoculating the parent generation with either a human (HM) or a mouse microbiota (MM). Furthermore, we tested if colonization efficiency and immune stimulation could be improved in HM-colonized mice by dietary approaches: if these were fed a diet closer to the human diet either in its sources of animal fat and protein [the "animal source" (AS) diet] or in its proportions of macronutrients from the normal sources of a mouse diet [the "human profile" (HP) diet].

resultsAlthough significantly lower in mice with a human microbiota (30-40% vs. 61-70%) the colonization efficiency was significantly higher in HM mice fed the HP diet (40%), and in MM mice fed AS (70%). The microbiota of mice fed HP was comparable to the microbiota of mice fed a standard rodent chow, while the microbiota of mice fed the animal source diet (AS) clustered separately. Mice inoculated with mouse fecal matter had significantly more CD4

conclusionIt is concluded that a diet with a humanized profile could support the establishment of a human microbiota in mice, which will, however, still elicit a lower colonization efficiency compared to mice inoculated with a mouse microbiota.

Indexed as

dietfecal microbiota transplantationflow cytometrygastrointestinal microbiomegene expressionlymphocytesmice

Identifiers

PMID32636823
PMCPMC7318556
OpenAlexW3036183760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.