ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Technical-Tactical Behaviors Analysis of Male and Female Judo Cadets' Combats.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combat Time in International Male Judo Competitions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Neurodevelopmental benefits of judo training in preschool children: a multinational, mixed methods follow-up study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- In-contest body acceleration profiles for the judo male and female weight divisions.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- The effects of training type and area size variations on the physiological and session rating of perceived exertion responses during male judo matches.Biology of sport · 2024Article
- Effects of weight divisions in time-motion of female high-level Brazilian Jiu-jitsu combat behaviors.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Aerobic Capacity and Restitution Efficiency Level in Relation to the Training Experience and Weekly Training Volume of Male and Female Judo National Team Members in the Cadet Age Group (U18) during the Preparatory Period.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Level of Technical and Tactical Skills and Its Relationships with Aerobic Capacity and Special Fitness in Elite Ju-Jitsu Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Characteristics of Technical and Tactical Preparation of Elite Judokas during the World Championships and Olympic Games.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Physical Fitness and the Level of Technical and Tactical Training of Kickboxers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Improving on Half-Lightweight Male Judokas' High Performance by the Application of the Analytic Network Process.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This brief research report showed technical-tactical behaviors of male and female judo cadets during combats, comparing the frequency and time of judo combat actions, techniques and penalties. The data was composed for 3,240 sequential technical-tactical behavior analysis from 108 female and 300 male cadet combats recorded of public judo championships. Combat, standing combat moments, approach action, gripping action, attack, groundwork actions and pause moment were observed and determinant technical-tactical behaviors (frequencies of actions, penalties and type of attacks) analysis were done with FRAMI software, followed by Mann-Whitney and Student's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.