ArticleVeterinary world2020
DNA of
Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of the prevalence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of mosquito sampling strategies on molecular xenomonitoring prevalence for filariasis: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Pooled it
- Spatial Clustering of Lymphatic Filariasis in Relation to Potential Mansonia Mosquito Habitats in Endemic Communities of Belitung Regency, Indonesia.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Mosquito vectors of lymphatic and zoonotic filariasis in Malaysia: a systematic review and proportionate meta-analysis of infection rates.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
- Post elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a situation analysis of brugian filariasis and vector potentialities within the filarial transmission belt in Sri Lanka.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Vector-borne diseases on Borneo island: a scoping review.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in wild caught vector and non-vector mosquitoes: implications for elimination of lymphatic filariasis.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimLymphatic filariasis (LF) is a lesser-known parasitic disease, which contributes to significant decreases in overall health. This study investigated the presence of MATERIALS AND
methodsMosquitoes were collected through bare leg collection methods after sunset in several areas of the Hukai and Gulinggang villages in the Balangan District. The collected mosquitoes were identified based on morphological features and dissected to find microfilaria and then pooled through species for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) microfilaria detection.
resultsA total of 837 female mosquitoes consisting of at least 14 species were selected; they were dissected, and no microfilariae were found. Mosquitoes were divided into 69 pools for PCR analysis. PCR revealed that 8.7% (6/69) of the pools were positive for
conclusionsThese results suggested that mosquito dissection was not an optimum method for finding microfilaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.