Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636465›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Tumor microenvironment characterization in head and neck cancer identifies prognostic and immunotherapeutically relevant gene signatures.

Mengqi Huo, Ying Zhang, Zhong Chen, Suxin Zhang, Yang Bao, Tianke Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of Epigenomic Alterations in HPV16+ Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  14. NAR cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Multiomics Integrative Analysis IdentifyingBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent progress of biomarkers in oral cancers.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengqi HuoSchool of Chinese Material Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102488, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, The Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Stomatology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
Suxin ZhangDepartment of Stomatology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
Yang BaoDepartment of Stomatology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
Tianke LiDepartment of Stomatology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China. 185563122@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is of great clinical significance for predicting the therapeutic effect of tumors. Nonetheless, there was no systematic analysis of cellular interactions in the TME of head and neck cancer (HNSC). This study used gene expression data from 816 patients with HNSC to analyze the scores of 22 immune cells. On this basis, we have established a novel TMEscore-based prognostic risk model. The relationship between TMEscore and clinical and genomic characteristics was analyzed. The sample was divided into risk-H and risk-L groups based on the prognosis risk model of TMEscore, with significant differences in overall survival between the two groups (log rank p < 0.001). In terms of clinical features, the TMEscore is closely related to the T staging, Grade, and HPV. As for genomic characteristics, the genomic features of the Risk-H samples are a low expression of immune-related genes and high-frequency mutations of TP53 and CEP152. This model was validated in an external test set, in which the prognosis for Risk-H group and Risk-L group was also significantly different (log rank p = 0.017). A quantitative method of TME infiltration pattern is established, which may be a potential predictor of HNSC prognosis.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, p53Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunityMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentCell Cycle ProteinsCEP152 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32636465
PMCPMC7341839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.