Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636283›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Development of an occupational advice intervention for patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement: a Delphi study.

Paul Baker, Lucksy Kottam, Carol Coole, Avril Drummond, Catriona McDaid, Amar Rangan, OPAL study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul BakerDepartment of Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK paul.baker1@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-8529-2417
Lucksy KottamDepartment of Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Carol CooleSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Avril DrummondDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Catriona McDaidYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-7260
Amar RanganDepartment of Orthopaedics, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5452-8578
OPAL study group

Funding

Department of Health 15/28/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo obtain consensus on the content and delivery of an occupational advice intervention for patients undergoing primary hip and knee replacement surgery. The primary targets for the intervention were (1) patients, carers and employers through the provision of individualised support and information about returning to work and (2) hospital orthopaedic teams through the development of a framework and materials to enable this support and information to be delivered.

designModified Delphi study as part of a wider intervention development study (The Occupational advice for Patients undergoing Arthroplasty of the Lower limb (OPAL) study: Health Technology Assessment Reference 15/28/02) (ISRCTN27426982).

settingFive stakeholder groups (patients, employers, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, allied health professionals and nurses) recruited from across the UK.

participantsSixty-six participants.

methodsStatements for the Delphi process were developed relating to the content, format, delivery, timing and measurement of an occupational advice intervention. The statements were based on evidence gathered through the OPAL study that was processed using an intervention mapping framework. Intervention content was examined in round 1 and intervention format, delivery, timing and measurement were examined in round 2. In round 3, the developed intervention was presented to the stakeholder groups for comment. CONSENSUS: For rounds 1 and 2, consensus was defined as 70% agreement or disagreement on a 4-point scale. Statements reaching consensus were ranked according to the distribution of responses to create a hierarchy of agreement. Round 3 comments were used to revise the final version of the developed occupational advice intervention.

resultsConsensus was reached for 36 of 64 round 1 content statements (all agreement). In round 2, 13 questions were carried forward and an additional 81 statements were presented. Of these, 49 reached consensus (44 agreement/5 disagreement). Eleven respondents provided an appraisal of the intervention in round 3.

conclusionsThe Delphi process informed the development of an occupational advice intervention as part of a wider intervention development study. Stakeholder agreement was achieved for a large number of intervention elements encompassing the content, format, delivery and timing of the intervention. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the developed intervention will require evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Trial ID: ISRCTN27426982.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeConsensusDelphi TechniqueElective Surgical ProceduresHospitalsHumansemploymenthip replacementknee replacementoccupational advicereturn to worksurgery

Identifiers

PMID32636283
PMCPMC7342851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.