Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636280›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Use of simulation training to teach the ABCDE primary assessment: an observational study in a Dutch University Hospital with a 3-4 months follow-up.

Amanda M Drost-de Klerck, Tycho J Olgers, Evelien K van de Meeberg, Johanna Schonrock-Adema, Jan C Ter Maaten

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Simulation in airway management teaching and training.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda M Drost-de KlerckEmergency Department, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands a.drost@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5432-7733
Tycho J OlgersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Evelien K van de MeebergEmergency Department, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna Schonrock-AdemaInstitute for Medical Education, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan C Ter MaatenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate short-term and long-term effectiveness of simulation training to acquire a structured Airway Breathing Circulation Disability Exposure (ABCDE) approach for medical emergencies; and to examine which skills were learnt and maintained best.

designAn observational study with a 3-4 months follow-up.

settingSkills center of the University Medical Center Groningen.

participantsThirty voluntary participants (21 females and 9 males; 27±2.77 years) of a simulation-based course.

interventionA 2-day ABCDE-teaching course for residents and non-residents. The course encompasses 24 simulations in which participants perform primary assessments of acute ill patients. Video recordings were taken of each participant performing a primary assessment, before (T1), directly after (T2) and 3-4 months after the intervention (T3).

main outcome measuresPhysicians' performance in the ABCDE primary assessment at T1, T2 and T3. Two observers scored the primary assessments, blinded to measurement moment, using an assessment form to evaluate the performance with regard to skills essential for a structured ABCDE approach. The Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare physicians' performances on the subsequent measurement moments.

resultsThe mean ranks on the total primary assessment at T1, T2 and T3 were 1.14, 2.62 and 2.24, respectively, and were significantly different, (p<0.001).The mean ranks on the total primary assessment directly after the course (T2 vs T1 p<0.001) and 3-4 months after the course (T3 vs T1 p<0.001) were significantly better than before the course. Certain skills deteriorated during the follow-up. Strikingly, most skills that decrease over time are Crew Resources Management (CRM) skills.

conclusionA course using simulation training is an effective educational tool to teach physicians the ABCDE primary assessment. Certain CRM skills decrease over time, so we recommend organising refresher courses, simulation team training or another kind of simulation training with a focus on CRM skills.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansMaleaccident and emergency medicineeducation and training (see medical education and training)general medicine (see internal medicine)medical education and training

Identifiers

PMID32636280
PMCPMC7342483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.