ArticleBJGP open2020
Interventions to improve uptake of urate-lowering therapy in patients with gout: a systematic review.
Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management and long-term serum urate control in gout: a population-based primary care cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- The Gut Microbiome in Hyperuricemia and Gout.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Pacific community's perceptions on how to improve uptake of urate-lowering therapy for Pacific gout patients.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Implementing treat-to-target urate-lowering therapy during hospitalizations for gout flares.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- What are the core recommendations for gout management in first line and specialist care? Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.BMC rheumatology · 2023Article
- Gout Remission as a Goal of Urate-Lowering Therapy: A Critical Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Gout.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Review
- Development and usability of a web-based patient-tailored tool to support adherence to urate-lowering therapy in gout.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Professionals' perspectives on existing practice and conditions for nurse-led gout care based on treatment recommendations: a qualitative study in primary healthcare.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Development of a patient decision aid for the initiation of urate-lowering therapy in gout patients.RMD open · 2022Article
- Design and implementation of a Pacific intervention to increase uptake of urate-lowering therapy for gout: a study protocol.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGout treatment is suboptimal despite available therapy, with low levels of initiation and persistence of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in many patients.
aimTo identify all interventions that have attempted to improve the uptake of ULT and analyse the clinical outcomes. DESIGN &
settingA systematic review of international articles published in English.
methodA systematic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus databases to identify all studies on relevant interventions for gout. Interventions were included if they aimed to address patient adherence with serum urate (SU) level as an outcome. This included patient education, practitioner monitoring, medication titration, SU monitoring, and ongoing patient engagement and follow-up. Follow-up studies to original interventions and those with only an abstract available were included.
resultsTwenty articles met the inclusion criteria, describing outcomes of 18 interventions conducted in primary care settings: six nurse-led, five pharmacist-led, and seven multidisciplinary, multifaceted interventions. Improvement in SU levels was observed in all interventions. Nurse-led interventions were effective at empowering patients as they addressed illness perceptions and provided education, advice, and telephone follow-up. Pharmacist-led interventions primarily aimed to monitor patients, alter medication dosage, and provide automated telephone follow-up. Various multifaceted programmes involving a range of providers resulted in increased sustained use of urate-lowering medication.
conclusionA nurse-led approach focusing on patient understanding about gout is the most effective in achieving improved patient adherence, and lowered SU levels among patients. An intervention should include patient education and follow-up components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.