Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32636201›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

Interventions to improve uptake of urate-lowering therapy in patients with gout: a systematic review.

Iqbal Gill, Nicola Dalbeth, Malakai 'Ofanoa, Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management and long-term serum urate control in gout: a population-based primary care cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. The Gut Microbiome in Hyperuricemia and Gout.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Gout.The New England journal of medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Iqbal GillFaculty of Medical & Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicola DalbethBone and Joint Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Malakai 'OfanoaPacific Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Felicity Goodyear-SmithDepartment of General Practice & Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand f.goodyear-smith@auckland.ac.nz.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGout treatment is suboptimal despite available therapy, with low levels of initiation and persistence of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in many patients.

aimTo identify all interventions that have attempted to improve the uptake of ULT and analyse the clinical outcomes. DESIGN &

settingA systematic review of international articles published in English.

methodA systematic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus databases to identify all studies on relevant interventions for gout. Interventions were included if they aimed to address patient adherence with serum urate (SU) level as an outcome. This included patient education, practitioner monitoring, medication titration, SU monitoring, and ongoing patient engagement and follow-up. Follow-up studies to original interventions and those with only an abstract available were included.

resultsTwenty articles met the inclusion criteria, describing outcomes of 18 interventions conducted in primary care settings: six nurse-led, five pharmacist-led, and seven multidisciplinary, multifaceted interventions. Improvement in SU levels was observed in all interventions. Nurse-led interventions were effective at empowering patients as they addressed illness perceptions and provided education, advice, and telephone follow-up. Pharmacist-led interventions primarily aimed to monitor patients, alter medication dosage, and provide automated telephone follow-up. Various multifaceted programmes involving a range of providers resulted in increased sustained use of urate-lowering medication.

conclusionA nurse-led approach focusing on patient understanding about gout is the most effective in achieving improved patient adherence, and lowered SU levels among patients. An intervention should include patient education and follow-up components.

Indexed as

general practicegouthyperuricemiaprimary health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32636201
PMCPMC7465587
OpenAlexW3040738578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.