ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020
Computational modeling of the strength of the ascending thoracic aortic media tissue under physiologic biaxial loading conditions.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bulk density-calibrated fiber networks reveal local weakness as the driver of protease-dependent aortic failure.International journal of engineering science · 2026Article
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Wall Tensile Stress Maps of Human Aneurysmal Aorta Demonstrate a High Biaxiality Ratio Corresponds with Wall Tissue Microstructure and Local Oxidative Stress Response Distinctly for Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Patients.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition involving delamination of ascending aortic media layers. While current clinical guidelines recommend surgical intervention for aneurysm diameter > 5.5 cm, high incidence of TAAD in patients below this diameter threshold indicates the pressing need for improved evidence-based risk prediction metrics. Construction of such metrics will require the knowledge of the biomechanical failure properties of the aortic wall tissue under biaxial loading conditions. We utilized a fiber-level finite element based structural model of the aortic tissue to quantify the relationship between aortic tissue strength and physiologically relevant biaxial stress state for nonaneurysmal and aneurysmal patient cohorts with tricuspid aortic valve phenotype. We found that the model predicted strength of the aortic tissue under physiologic biaxial loading conditions depends on the stress biaxiality ratio, defined by the ratio of the longitudinal and circumferential components of the tissue stress. We determined that predicted biaxial tissue strength is statistically similar to its uniaxial circumferential strength below biaxiality ratios of 0.68 and 0.69 for nonaneurysmal and aneurysmal cohorts, respectively. Beyond this biaxiality ratio, predicted biaxial strength for both cohorts reduced drastically to a magnitude statistically similar to its longitudinal strength. We identified fiber-level failure mechanisms operative under biaxial stress state governing aforementioned tissue failure behavior. These findings are an important first step towards the development of mechanism-based TAAD risk assessment metrics for early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.