Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635938›Full record

Trial reportItalian journal of pediatrics2020

Efficacy of Pidotimod use in treating allergic rhinitis in a pediatric population.

Giulia Brindisi, Anna Maria Zicari, Laura Schiavi, Alessandra Gori, Maria Pia Conte, Massimiliano Marazzato, Giovanna De Castro, Lucia Leonardi, Marzia Duse

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. From Legacy to Innovation: Pidotimod's Expanding Therapeutic Horizon.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Pidotimod in pediatrics: new evidence and future perspectives.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia BrindisiDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. giulia.brindisi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-6082
Anna Maria ZicariDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Laura SchiaviDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra GoriDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Maria Pia ConteDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Microbiology Section, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano MarazzatoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Microbiology Section, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna De CastroDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Lucia LeonardiDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Marzia DuseDepartment of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Policlinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) and adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) are the most frequent causative disorders of nasal obstruction in children, leading to recurrent respiratory infections. Both nasal cavities are colonized by a stable microbial community susceptible to environmental changes and Staphylococcus aureus seems to play the major role. Furthermore, nasal microbiota holds a large number and variety of viruses with upper respiratory tract infections. This local microbiota deserves attention because its modification could induce a virtuous cross-talking with the immune system, with a better clearance of pathogens. Although AR and AH present a different etiopathogenesis, they have in common a minimal chronic inflammation surrounding nasal obstruction; hence it would be challenging to evaluate the effect of an immunomodulator on this minimal chronic inflammation with possible clinical and microbiological effects. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the efficacy of an immunomoldulator (Pidotimod) on nasal obstruction in children with AR and/or AH and whether its action involves a variation of nasal microbiota.

methodsWe enrolled 76 children: those with allergic rhinitis (AR) sensitized to dust mites entered the AR group, those with adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) the AH group, those with both conditions the AR/AH group and those without AR ± AH as controls (CTRL). At the first visit they performed: skin prick tests, nasal fiberoptic endoscopy, anterior rhinomanometry, nasal swabs. Children with. AR ± AH started treatment with Pidotimod. After 1 month they were re-evaluated performing the same procedures. The primary outcome was the evaluation of nasal obstruction after treatment and the secondary outcome was the improvement of symptoms and the changes in nasal microflora.

resultsAll patients improved their mean nasal flow (mNF) in respect to the baseline. In AR children mNF reached that one of CTRL. In AH children±AR the mNF was lower in respect to CTRL and AR group. We did not find any differences among all the groups at the two different time points in nasal microflora.

conclusionsPidotimod is able to give an improvement in nasal obstruction, especially in AR children but this effect seems to be not mediated by changes in nasal microbiota.

Indexed as

AdenoidsAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansHypertrophyImmunologic FactorsItalyMaleNasal ObstructionPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidRhinitis, AllergicThiazolidinesTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorspidotimodPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidThiazolidinesMicrobiotaNasal obstructionPidotimodRhinomanometry

Identifiers

PMID32635938
PMCPMC7341603
OpenAlexW3042190352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.