Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635922›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Predicting developmental dysplasia of the hip in at-risk newborns.

Andreas Roposch, Evangelia Protopapa, Olivia Malaga-Shaw, Yael Gelfer, Paul Humphries, Deborah Ridout, John H Wedge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas RoposchInstitute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guildford St, London, WC1N 3EH, UK. a.roposch@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0143-7840
Evangelia ProtopapaInstitute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guildford St, London, WC1N 3EH, UK.
Olivia Malaga-ShawRoyal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Yael GelferDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Paul HumphriesDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Deborah RidoutInstitute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guildford St, London, WC1N 3EH, UK.
John H WedgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0213-30046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of developmental dysplasia of the hip can be attributed to several risk factors and often in combination with each other. When predicting the likelihood of developing this condition, clinicians tend to over and underestimate its likelihood of occurring. Therefore, the study aim is to determine among at-risk newborns how to best predict developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) within 8 weeks post-partum.

methodsProspective cohort study in secondary care. Patient population included newborns at-risk for DDH - we assessed 13,276 consecutive newborns for the presence of DDH risk factors. Only newborns with at least one of the predefined risk factors and those showing an abnormal examination of the hip were enrolled (n = 2191). For the development of a risk prediction model we considered 9 candidate predictors and other variables readily available at childbirth. The main outcome measure was ultrasonography at a median age of 8 weeks using consensus diagnostic criteria; outcome assessors were blinded.

resultsThe risk model includes four predictors: female sex (OR = 5.6; 95% CI: 2.9-10.9; P <  0.001); first degree family history of DDH (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 2.3-9.0; P <  0.001), birthweight > 4000 g (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 0.6-4.2; P = 0.34), and abnormal examination of hip (OR = 58.8; 95% CI: 31.9, 108.5; P <  0.001). This model demonstrated excellent discrimination (C statistic = 0.9) and calibration of observed and predicted risk (P = 0.35). A model without the variable 'hip examination' demonstrated similar performance.

conclusionThe risk model quantifies absolute risk of DDH within 8 weeks postpartum in at-risk newborns. Based on clinical variables readily available at the point of childbirth, the model will enhance parental counselling and could serve as the basis for real time decisions prior to discharge from maternity wards.

Indexed as

Developmental Dysplasia of the HipHip Dislocation, CongenitalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUltrasonographyDevelopmental dysplasia of the hipNew bornPrediction modelRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32635922
PMCPMC7341560
OpenAlexW3038952173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.