Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635871›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Natal philopatry increases relatedness within groups of coral reef cardinalfish.

Theresa Rueger, Hugo B Harrison, Peter M Buston, Naomi M Gardiner, Michael L Berumen, Geoffrey P Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. No evidence for kin selection as an explanation for social group formation in clown anemonefish.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theresa RuegerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Hugo B HarrisonAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Peter M BustonDepartment of Biology and Marine Program, Boston University, 5 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Naomi M GardinerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Michael L BerumenRed Sea Research Center, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Geoffrey P JonesCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central issue in evolutionary ecology is how patterns of dispersal influence patterns of relatedness in populations. In terrestrial organisms, limited dispersal of offspring leads to groups of related individuals. By contrast, for most marine organisms, larval dispersal in open waters is thought to minimize kin associations within populations. However, recent molecular evidence and theoretical approaches have shown that limited dispersal, sibling cohesion and/or differential reproductive success can lead to kin association and elevated relatedness. Here, we tested the hypothesis that limited dispersal explains small-scale patterns of relatedness in the pajama cardinalfish

Indexed as

Population DynamicsAnimal DistributionAnimalsCoral ReefsFishesMicrosatellite RepeatsPapua New GuineaPerciformescardinalfishgenetic relatednesskin cohesionlimited dispersalnatal philopatryreproductive sweepstakes

Identifiers

PMID32635871
PMCPMC7423479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.