Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635668›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Mycobacteria-Based Vaccines as Immunotherapy for Non-urological Cancers.

Estela Noguera-Ortega, Sandra Guallar-Garrido, Esther Julián

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. BCG as an Innovative Option for HCC Treatment: Repurposing and Mechanistic Insights.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Novel molecules as the emerging trends in cancer treatment: an update.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  8. Genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Potential ofOncoimmunology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Estela Noguera-OrtegaMycobacteria Research Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6507-0673
Sandra Guallar-GarridoMycobacteria Research Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-5757
Esther JuliánMycobacteria Research Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6558-3978
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya 2017SGR-229Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities/FEDER funds RTI2018-098777-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arsenal against different types of cancers has increased impressively in the last decade. The detailed knowledge of the tumor microenvironment enables it to be manipulated in order to help the immune system fight against tumor cells by using specific checkpoint inhibitors, cell-based treatments, targeted antibodies, and immune stimulants. In fact, it is widely known that the first immunotherapeutic tools as immune stimulants for cancer treatment were bacteria and still are; specifically, the use of

Indexed as

adjuvantBCGimmunotherapymycobacteria antigensnon-tuberculous mycobacteria

Identifiers

PMID32635668
PMCPMC7408281
OpenAlexW3038635172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.