Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635634›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Digital Pathology and PD-L1 Testing in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Workshop Record.

Fabio Pagni, Umberto Malapelle, Claudio Doglioni, Gabriella Fontanini, Filippo Fraggetta, Paolo Graziano, Antonio Marchetti, Elena Guerini Rocco, Pasquale Pisapia, Elena V Vigliar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio PagniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-1637
Umberto MalapelleDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
Claudio DoglioniPathology Unit, San Raffaele Hospital Scientific Institute, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Gabriella FontaniniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Filippo FraggettaPathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Cannizzaro Hospital, 95126 Catania, Italy.
Paolo GrazianoPathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7066-7896
Antonio MarchettiCenter of Predictive Molecular Medicine, University-Foundation, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Elena Guerini RoccoDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Pasquale PisapiaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-0620
Elena V VigliarDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fiamma ButtittaCenter of Predictive Molecular Medicine, University-Foundation, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Marta JaconiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University Milan Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-9131
Massimo BarberisDivision of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-4804
Giancarlo TronconeDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-5805
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A meeting among expert pathologists was held in 2019 in Rome to verify the results of the previous harmonization efforts on the PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing by scoring a representative series of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) digital slides. The current paper shows the results of this digital experimental meeting and the expertise achieved by the community of Italian pathologists. PD-L1 protein expression was determined using tumor proportion score (TPS), i.e., the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining at any intensity. The gold standard was defined as the final PD-L1 score formulated by a panel of seven lung committed pathologists. PD-L1 status was clustered in three categories, namely negative (TPS < 1), low (TPS 1-49%), and high (TPS ≥ 50%). In 23 cases (71.9%) PD-L1 staining was performed using the companion diagnostic 22C3 pharmDx kit on Dako Autostainer, while in nine (28.1%) cases it was performed using the SP263 Ventana kit on BenchMark platform. A complete PD-L1 scoring agreement between the panel of experts and the participants was reached in 57.1% of cases, whereas a minor disagreement in 16.1% of cases was recorded. Italian pathologists performed best in strong positive cases (i.e., tumor proportion score TPS > 50%), whereas only 10.8% of disagreement with the gold standard was observed, and 55.6% regarded a single challenging case. The worst performance was achieved in the negative cases, with 32.0% disagreement. A significant difference resulted from the analysis of the data separated by the different clones used: 22.3% and 38.1% disagreement (

Indexed as

immunotherapyNSCLCPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID32635634
PMCPMC7408471
OpenAlexW3040466694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.