ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Diagnostic Value of
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological detection rate and clinical impact of thoracoabdominal computed tomography in suspected infection in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Guiding Biopsy Decisions and Differentiating Infectious, Inflammatory and Malignant Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Unsupervised clustering of PET/CT features in fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Fever of unknown origin (FUO): a 7-year clinical experience, etiological distribution, and diagnostic approaches.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Development and validation ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Differential diagnosis of lymphoma withJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- Optimal use of the FDG-PET/CT in the diagnostic process of fever of unknown origin (FUO): a comprehensive review.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Diagnostic models for fever of unknown origin based onEJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Article
- Characterizing omental PET/CT findings for differentiating tuberculous peritonitis from peritoneal carcinomatosis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- The Utility of 18FDG-PET/CT in Diagnosing Fever of Unknown Origin: The Experience of a Large Tertiary Medical Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Application of Machine Learning for the Prediction of Etiological Types of Classic Fever of Unknown Origin.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Identify. Quantify. Predict. Why Immunologists Should Widely Use Molecular Imaging for Coronavirus Disease 2019.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional diagnostic imaging is often ineffective in revealing the underlying cause in a considerable proportion of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.