Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635476›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Imaging Tools and Dosimetric Predictive Factors for Radionecrosis.

Marco Lupattelli, Emanuele Alì, Gianluca Ingrosso, Simonetta Saldi, Christian Fulcheri, Simona Borghesi, Roberto Tarducci, Cynthia Aristei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Brain metastases: the role of clinical imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco LupattelliRadiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, 06022 Perugia, Italy.
Emanuele AlìRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, 6100 Perugia, Italy.
Gianluca IngrossoRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, 6100 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4380-6947
Simonetta SaldiRadiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, 06022 Perugia, Italy.
Christian FulcheriMedical Physics Department, Perugia General Hospital, 06022 Perugia, Italy.
Simona BorghesiUnit of Radiation Oncology, S.Donato Hospital, 20097 Arezzo, Italy.
Roberto TarducciMedical Physics Department, Perugia General Hospital, 06022 Perugia, Italy.
Cynthia AristeiRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, 6100 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-649X
University of Perugia · ITOspedale San Donato · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radionecrosis (RN) is the most important side effect after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, with a reported incidence ranging from 3% to 24%. To date, there are no unanimously accepted criteria for iconographic diagnosis of RN, as well as no definitive dose-constraints correlated with the onset of this late effect. We reviewed the current literature and gave an overview report on imaging options for the diagnosis of RN and on dosimetric parameters correlated with the onset of RN. We performed a PubMed literature search according to the preferred reporting items and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and identified articles published within the last ten years, up to 31 December 2019. When analyzing data on diagnostic tools, perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seems to be very useful allowing evaluation of the blood flow in the lesion using the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and blood vessel integrity using relative peak weight (rPH). It is necessary to combine morphological with functional imaging in order to match information about lesion morphology, metabolism and blood-flow. Eventually, serial imaging follow-up is needed. Regarding dosimetric parameters, in radiosurgery (SRS) V12 < 8 cm

Indexed as

dosimetric parametersimaging toolsradionecrosisstereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32635476
PMCPMC7565332
OpenAlexW3039948062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.