Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32635407›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Control of Foodborne Biological Hazards by Ionizing Radiations.

Muhammad Tanveer Munir, Michel Federighi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Unveiling the persistent threat: recent insights intoJournal of food science and technology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Physical Treatments to ControlFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Innovative Seafood Preservation Technologies: Recent Developments.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad Tanveer MunirLIMBHA, Ecole Supérieure du Bois, 7 rue Christian Pauc, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6125-2960
Michel FederighiOniris, UMR 1014 SECALIM Oniris/INRAe, route de Gachet, CS 40706, CEDEX 3, 44307 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1108-6490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionization radiations are used to ensure food safety and quality. This irradiation process uses ions of beta or gamma rays to inactivate or destroy the food spoilage pests, microorganisms and their toxins without significantly increasing the temperature of the treated product. Meanwhile, various intrinsic and extrinsic factors are involved in determining the efficacy of ionization irradiation against these organisms. Therefore, the dose of radiations is recommended according to the type of irradiation, substrate and microorganisms. However, controversies are surrounding the use of irradiations in the food industry due to a negative perception of irradiations. This manuscript described the use of ionization radiations to control the foodborne biological hazards and increase shelf life. Firstly, the characteristics and mode of action of irradiations were discussed. Secondly, the role of extrinsic and intrinsic factors influencing the radioresistance of biological hazards were elaborated. This literature review also detailed the differential effects of irradiations on different microorganisms and pests having a role in food safety and deterioration. Finally, the regulatory status and the consumer values along with the controversies surrounding the use of ionization irradiations in the food sector were explained.

Indexed as

food safetyionizationmicrobiologypreservationradiation

Identifiers

PMID32635407
PMCPMC7404640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.