Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634877›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2020

Choosing preferable labels for the Japanese translation of the Human Phenotype Ontology.

Kota Ninomiya, Terue Takatsuki, Tatsuya Kushida, Yasunori Yamamoto, Soichi Ogishima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kota NinomiyaNational Institute of Public Health, Wako 351-0197, Japan.
Terue TakatsukiDatabase Center for Life Science, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Kashiwa 277-0871, Japan.
Tatsuya KushidaBioResource Research Center, RIKEN, Tsukuba 305-0074, Japan.
Yasunori YamamotoDatabase Center for Life Science, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Kashiwa 277-0871, Japan.
Soichi OgishimaAdvanced Research Center for Innovations in Next-Generation Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8573, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is the de facto standard ontology to describe human phenotypes in detail, and it is actively used, particularly in the field of rare disease diagnoses. For clinicians who are not fluent in English, the HPO has been translated into many languages, and there have been four initiatives to develop Japanese translations. At the Biomedical Linked Annotation Hackathon 6 (BLAH6), a rule-based approach was attempted to determine the preferable Japanese translation for each HPO term among the candidates developed by the four approaches. The relationship between the HPO and Mammalian Phenotype translations was also investigated, with the eventual goal of harmonizing the two translations to facilitate phenotype-based comparisons of species in Japanese through cross-species phenotype matching. In order to deal with the increase in the number of HPO terms and the need for manual curation, it would be useful to have a dictionary containing word-by-word correspondences and fixed translation phrases for English word order. These considerations seem applicable to HPO localization into other languages.

Indexed as

biological ontologiesnatural language processingphenotyperare diseasestranslations

Identifiers

PMID32634877
PMCPMC7362946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.