ArticleThe Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon2021
Proximalized Total Arch Replacement Can Be Safely Performed by Trainee.
Article in The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proximal and extended aortic arch replacement in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Silent cerebral ischemia detected by magnetic resonance imaging can predict postoperative delirium after total arch replacement for aneurysm.JTCVS open · 2022Article
- Early Results of a Novel Hybrid Prosthesis for Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A With Distal Anastomosis Line Beyond Aortic Arch Zone Zero.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Teaching Cardiac Surgery: A Major Contemporary Issue in the Academic Institutions.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to validate safety of total arch replacement (TAR) using a novel frozen elephant trunk device, operated by trainees as surgical education.
methodsSixty-four patients including 19 patients (29.6%) with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) underwent TAR in our institute between April 2014 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-nine patients were operated by trainees (group T) and 35 patients were operated by attending surgeons (group A).
resultsPatient characteristics did not differ between groups. Operative time (409.4 ± 87.8 vs. 468.6 ± 129.6 minutes,
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated that TAR can be safely performed by trainees, and suggests TAR as a possible and safe educational operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.