Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634799›Full record

ArticlePathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology2021

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Associated Belgian Governmental Measures on Cancer Screening, Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology.

Marie-Caroline de Pelsemaeker, Yves Guiot, Jonathan Vanderveken, Christine Galant, Mieke Rosalie Van Bockstal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie-Caroline de PelsemaekerDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Yves GuiotDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonathan VandervekenDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine GalantDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Mieke Rosalie Van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, mieke.vanbockstal@uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 caused a pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Unprecedented public health actions were introduced, including social distancing, travel restrictions and quarantine. The Belgian government announced a national emergency plan, thereby postponing all non-urgent medical consultations and operations. This report analyses the impact of these measures on cancer screening, through assessment of the workload of a laboratory for histopathology and cytopathology.

methodsData on monthly numbers of histological and cytological samples, immunohistochemistry and molecular tests were extracted from the laboratory information management system.

resultsThe global histopathological and cytological workload was substantially reduced. The impact on oncology-related surgical procedures was rather limited. The anti-COVID-19 measures significantly diminished all screening-related samples, such as colon biopsies, breast biopsies and cervical cytology, and strongly reduced the number of samples related to "functional" pathology, such as thyroidectomies and gastric biopsies.

conclusionsSince many health care interventions are reflected in the workload of a pathology laboratory, this study enabled us to identify areas for "deconfinement" health care actions. Our findings indicate that various areas in medicine were affected, but the impact seemed largest for cancer screening. Health care professionals should assure that consultations related to cancer screening are postponed instead of cancelled.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerGovernmentBelgiumCOVID-19HumansNeoplasmsPathology, SurgicalQuarantineSARS-CoV-2Cancer screeningCervical cytologyCOVID-19HistopathologySARS-CoV-2 infection

Identifiers

PMID32634799
PMCPMC7445376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.