Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634384›Full record

ArticleCell systems2020

A Single-Cell Transcriptomics CRISPR-Activation Screen Identifies Epigenetic Regulators of the Zygotic Genome Activation Program.

Celia Alda-Catalinas, Danila Bredikhin, Irene Hernando-Herraez, Fátima Santos, Oana Kubinyecz, Mélanie A Eckersley-Maslin, Oliver Stegle, Wolf Reik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The multi-omics regulatory landscape of human early embryogenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A chemical epigenetic tool to probe site-specific DNA-binding protein complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. SCoTCH-seq reveals that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine encodes regulatory information across DNA strands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Celia Alda-CatalinasEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Danila BredikhinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Irene Hernando-HerraezEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Fátima SantosEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Oana KubinyeczEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Mélanie A Eckersley-MaslinEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK. Electronic address: eckersleym@babraham.ac.uk.
Oliver StegleEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg 69117, Germany; Division of Computational Genomics and Systems Genetics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany; European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. Electronic address: oliver.stegle@embl.de.
Wolf ReikEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Centre for Trophoblast Research University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK. Electronic address: wolf.reik@babraham.ac.uk.
Babraham Institute · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0422Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T009713/1Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105031/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 210754/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zygotic genome activation (ZGA) is an essential transcriptional event in embryonic development that coincides with extensive epigenetic reprogramming. Complex manipulation techniques and maternal stores of proteins preclude large-scale functional screens for ZGA regulators within early embryos. Here, we combined pooled CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) with single-cell transcriptomics to identify regulators of ZGA-like transcription in mouse embryonic stem cells, which serve as a tractable, in vitro proxy of early mouse embryos. Using multi-omics factor analysis (MOFA+) applied to ∼200,000 single-cell transcriptomes comprising 230 CRISPRa perturbations, we characterized molecular signatures of ZGA and uncovered 24 factors that promote a ZGA-like response. Follow-up assays validated top screen hits, including the DNA-binding protein Dppa2, the chromatin remodeler Smarca5, and the transcription factor Patz1, and functional experiments revealed that Smarca5's regulation of ZGA-like transcription is dependent on Dppa2. Together, our single-cell transcriptomic profiling of CRISPRa-perturbed cells provides both system-level and molecular insights into the mechanisms that orchestrate ZGA.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsEpigenesis, GeneticGenomeHumansTranscriptomeZygoteCRISPRaDppa2MOFAPatz1screenscRNA-seqsingle cellSmarca5ZGAzygotic genome activation

Identifiers

PMID32634384
PMCPMC7383230
OpenAlexW3038446536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.