ArticleJournal of vision2020
Painterly depiction of material properties.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Material fictions: Comparing physically based renderings and generative AI images through material perception.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Time-of-day perception in paintings.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The role of texture summary statistics in material recognition from drawings and photographs.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Context effects on the perception of saturation of fruit colors in still-life paintings.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Zooming in on style: Exploring style perception using details of paintings.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Crystal or jelly? Effect of color on the perception of translucent materials with photographs of real-world objects.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Translucency perception: A review.Journal of vision · 2021Review
- Perception of material appearance: A comparison between painted and rendered images.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17th century paintings.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Materials In Paintings (MIP): An interdisciplinary dataset for perception, art history, and computer vision.PloS one · 2021Article
- If painters give you lemons, squeeze the knowledge out of them. A study on the visual perception of the translucent and juicy appearance of citrus fruits in paintings.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Material perception across different media-comparing perceived attributes in oil paintings and engravings.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Painters are masters of depiction and have learned to evoke a clear perception of materials and material attributes in a natural, three-dimensional setting, with complex lighting conditions. Furthermore, painters are not constrained by reality, meaning that they could paint materials without exactly following the laws of nature, while still evoking the perception of materials. Paintings have to our knowledge not been studied on a big scale from a material perception perspective. In this article, we studied the perception of painted materials and their attributes by using human annotations to find instances of 15 materials, such as wood, stone, fabric, etc. Participants made perceptual judgments about 30 unique segments of these materials for 10 material attributes, such as glossiness, roughness, hardness, etc. We found that participants were able to perform this task well while being highly consistent. Participants, however, did not consistently agree with each other, and the measure of consistency depended on the material attribute being perceived. Additionally, we found that material perception appears to function independently of the medium of depiction-the results of our principal component analysis agreed well with findings in former studies for photographs and computer renderings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.