Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634164›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Accessing medicines for non-communicable diseases: Patients and health care workers' experiences at public and private health facilities in Uganda.

Andrew K Tusubira, Ann R Akiteng, Brenda D Nakirya, Ritah Nalwoga, Isaac Ssinabulya, Christine K Nalwadda, Jeremy I Schwartz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew K TusubiraUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-3666
Ann R AkitengUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.
Brenda D NakiryaUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.
Ritah NalwogaUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaac SsinabulyaUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.
Christine K NalwaddaUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.
Jeremy I SchwartzUganda Initiative for Integrated Management of Non-Communicable Diseases, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-2600
Uganda Institute of Information & Communications Technology · UGMulago Hospital · UGYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) are increasingly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. Successful management requires consistent access to appropriate medicines. Availability of NCD medicines is generally low, especially in the public sector, however, little is known about other factors affecting access. We explored barriers and facilitators of access to medicines for diabetes and hypertension at public and private health facilities in Uganda.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study at six public hospitals and five private health facilities in different regions of Uganda. Data collection included 36 in-depth interviews and 14 focus group discussions (n = 128) among purposively selected adult outpatients with diabetes and/or hypertension and 26 key informant interviews with healthcare workers and patient association leaders. Transcripts were coded and emerging themes identified using the Framework method.

resultsFour main themes emerged: Stocking of medicines and supplies, Financial factors, Individual behaviour and attitudes, and Service delivery at health facilities. Stocking of medicines and supplies mainly presented barriers to access at public facilities including frequent stockouts, failure to stock certain medicines and low quality brands often rejected by patients. Financial factors, especially high cost of medicines and limited insurance coverage, were barriers in private facilities. Free service provision was a facilitator at public facilities. Patients' confusion resulting from mixed messages and their preference for herbal treatments were cross-sector barriers. While flexibility in NCD service provision was a facilitator at private facilities, provider burnout and limited operating hours were barriers in public facilities. Patient-driven associations exist at some public facilities and help mitigate inadequate medicine stock.

conclusionAccess to NCD medicines in Uganda is influenced by both health system and patient factors. Some factors are sector-specific, while others cross-cutting between public and private sectors. Due to commonalities in barriers, potential strategies for overcoming them may include patient-driven associations, public-private partnerships, and multi-modal health education platforms.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityDiabetes MellitusHealth PersonnelHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansHypertensionNoncommunicable DiseasesPatient Acceptance of Health CareUganda

Identifiers

PMID32634164
PMCPMC7340292
OpenAlexW3039437037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.