Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634123›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2020

Microdissected pancreatic cancer proteomes reveal tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic targets.

Tessa Ys Le Large, Giulia Mantini, Laura L Meijer, Thang V Pham, Niccola Funel, Nicole Ct van Grieken, Bart Kok, Jaco Knol, Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven, Sander R Piersma and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional and Clinical Proteomic Exploration of Pancreatic Cancer.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa Ys Le LargeDepartment of Surgery and.
Giulia MantiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Laura L MeijerDepartment of Surgery and.
Thang V PhamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Niccola FunelUnit of Anatomic Pathology II, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Nicole Ct van GriekenUnit of Anatomic Pathology II, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Bart KokDepartment of Surgery and.
Jaco KnolDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hanneke Wm van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sander R PiersmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Connie R JimenezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
G KazemierDepartment of Surgery and.
Elisa GiovannettiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maarten F BijlsmaLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITFondazione Pisa · ITOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a relative paucity of cancer cells that are surrounded by an abundance of nontumor cells and extracellular matrix, known as stroma. The interaction between stroma and cancer cells contributes to poor outcome, but how proteins from these individual compartments drive aggressive tumor behavior is not known. Here, we report the proteomic analysis of laser-capture microdissected (LCM) PDAC samples. We isolated stroma, tumor, and bulk samples from a cohort with long- and short-term survivors. Compartment-specific proteins were measured by mass spectrometry, yielding what we believe to be the largest PDAC proteome landscape to date. These analyses revealed that, in bulk analysis, tumor-derived proteins were typically masked and that LCM was required to reveal biology and prognostic markers. We validated tumor CALB2 and stromal COL11A1 expression as compartment-specific prognostic markers. We identified and functionally addressed the contributions of the tumor cell receptor EPHA2 to tumor cell viability and motility, underscoring the value of compartment-specific protein analysis in PDAC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalExtracellular MatrixFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProteomeStromal CellsBiomarkers, TumorProteomeCancerCell BiologyMolecular biologyOncologyProteomics

Identifiers

PMID32634123
PMCPMC7455080
OpenAlexW3039163883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.