Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32634121›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2020

MEK activation modulates glycolysis and supports suppressive myeloid cells in TNBC.

Derek A Franklin, Joe T Sharick, Paula I Ericsson-Gonzalez, Violeta Sanchez, Phillip T Dean, Susan R Opalenik, Stefano Cairo, Jean-Gabriel Judde, Michael T Lewis, Jenny C Chang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Emerging Therapeutic Landscapes for KRAS-Mutant Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Beyond the "Undruggable" Paradigm.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Modulating Glycolysis to Improve Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek A FranklinDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joe T SharickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Paula I Ericsson-GonzalezBreast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Violeta SanchezBreast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Phillip T DeanDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Susan R OpalenikDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Stefano CairoXentech, Genopole Campus 3, Evry, France.
Jean-Gabriel JuddeXentech, Genopole Campus 3, Evry, France.
Michael T LewisBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jenny C ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
Melinda E SandersBreast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Rebecca S CookDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville Tennessee, USA.
Melissa C SkalaMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jennifer BordeauxNavigate BioPharma Services, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA.
Jehovana Orozco BenderNavigate BioPharma Services, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA.
Christine VaupelNavigate BioPharma Services, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA.
Gary GeissNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Douglas HinerfeldNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Justin M BalkoDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Breast Cancer Research Foundation · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USNavidea Biopharmaceuticals (United States) · USGenopole (France) · FRNanostring Technologies (United States) · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHouston Methodist · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
Optical imaging of pancreas cancer organoids for drug development and personalized treatmentR01CA211082 · NCI · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Dusp4 in breast cancer: tumor suppressor biology and therapeutic strategiesR00CA181491 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BALKO, JUSTIN M · 2015 to 2017
$750k
Pannoramic 250 BF Flash Tissue Microarray systemS10OD016355 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, KELLI L. · 2014 to 2014
$453k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS R00 CA181491NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211082NIH HHS S10 OD016355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are heterogeneous and aggressive, with high mortality rates. TNBCs frequently respond to chemotherapy, yet many patients develop chemoresistance. The molecular basis and roles for tumor cell-stromal crosstalk in establishing chemoresistance are complex and largely unclear. Here we report molecular studies of paired TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) established before and after the development of chemoresistance. Interestingly, the chemoresistant model acquired a distinct KRASQ61R mutation that activates K-Ras. The chemoresistant KRAS-mutant model showed gene expression and proteomic changes indicative of altered tumor cell metabolism. Specifically, KRAS-mutant PDXs exhibited increased redox ratios and decreased activation of AMPK, a protein involved in responding to metabolic homeostasis. Additionally, the chemoresistant model exhibited increased immunosuppression, including expression of CXCL1 and CXCL2, cytokines responsible for recruiting immunosuppressive leukocytes to tumors. Notably, chemoresistant KRAS-mutant tumors harbored increased numbers of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (gMDSCs). Interestingly, previously established Ras/MAPK-associated gene expression signatures correlated with myeloid/neutrophil-recruiting CXCL1/2 expression and negatively with T cell-recruiting chemokines (CXCL9/10/11) across patients with TNBC, even in the absence of KRAS mutations. MEK inhibition induced tumor suppression in mice while reversing metabolic and immunosuppressive phenotypes, including chemokine production and gMDSC tumor recruitment in the chemoresistant KRAS-mutant tumors. These results suggest that Ras/MAPK pathway inhibitors may be effective in some breast cancer patients to reverse Ras/MAPK-driven tumor metabolism and immunosuppression, particularly in the setting of chemoresistance.

Indexed as

GlycolysisAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMAP Kinase Kinase 1MiceMice, NudeMyeloid-Derived Suppressor Cellsras ProteinsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorMAP Kinase Kinase 1ras ProteinsBreast cancerImmunologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID32634121
PMCPMC7455066
OpenAlexW3038360384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.