Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32633899›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2020

Corticomotor reorganization during short-term visuomotor training in the lower back: A randomized controlled study.

Rocco Cavaleri, Lucy S Chipchase, Hugo Massé-Alarie, Siobhan M Schabrun, Muath A Shraim, Paul W Hodges

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rocco CavaleriSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-1703
Lucy S ChipchaseSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
Hugo Massé-AlarieCIRRIS Research Centre, Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
Siobhan M SchabrunNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9083-3107
Muath A ShraimFaculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Paul W HodgesFaculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council APP105040Medical Research Council APP1102905National Health and Medical Research Council APP105040National Health and Medical Research Council APP1091302National Health and Medical Research Council APP1102905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccumulating evidence suggests that motor skill training is associated with structural and functional reorganization of the primary motor cortex. However, previous studies have focussed primarily upon the upper limb, and it is unclear whether comparable reorganization occurs following training of other regions, such as the lower back. Although this holds important implications for rehabilitation, no studies have examined corticomotor adaptations following short-term motor training in the lower back.

methodThe aims of this study were to (a) determine whether a short-term lumbopelvic tilt visuomotor task induced reorganization of the corticomotor representations of lower back muscles, (b) quantify the variability of corticomotor responses to motor training, and (c) determine whether any improvements in task performance were correlated with corticomotor reorganization. Participants were allocated randomly to perform a lumbopelvic tilt motor training task (n = 15) or a finger abduction control task involving no lumbopelvic movement (n = 15). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to map corticomotor representations of the lumbar erector spinae before, during, and after repeated performance of the allocated task.

resultsNo relationship between corticomotor reorganization and improved task performance was identified. Substantial variability was observed in terms of corticomotor responses to motor training, with approximately 50% of participants showing no corticomotor reorganization despite significant improvements in task performance.

conclusionThese findings suggest that short-term improvements in lower back visuomotor task performance may be driven by changes in remote subcortical and/or spinal networks rather than adaptations in corticomotor pathways. However, further research using tasks of varying complexities and durations is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultcorticomotor reorganizationlower backmotor learningTMS

Identifiers

PMID32633899
PMCPMC7428511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.