Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32633815›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2021

An update on the origin of SARS-CoV-2: Despite closest identity, bat (RaTG13) and pangolin derived coronaviruses varied in the critical binding site and O-linked glycan residues.

Jeevan Malaiyan, Suresh Arumugam, Kamalraj Mohan, Gokul Gomathi Radhakrishnan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeevan MalaiyanDivision of Virology, Department of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-308X
Suresh ArumugamCentral Research Facility, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kancheepuram, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-1156
Kamalraj MohanDivision of Virology, Department of Microbiology, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, India.
Gokul Gomathi RadhakrishnanDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Affiliated to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai, India.
Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University · INMeenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) occurred in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and swept the world by 23 June 2020 with 8 993 659 active cases, 469 587 deaths across 216 countries, areas or territories. This strongly implies global transmission occurred before the lockdown of China. However, the initial source's transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 remain obscure and controversial. Research data suggest bat (RaTG13) and pangolin carried CoV were the proximal source of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we used systematic phylogenetic analysis of Coronavirinae subfamily along with wild type human SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 strains. The key residues of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and O-linked glycan were compared. SARS-CoV-2 strains were clustered with RaTG13 (97.41% identity), Pangolin-CoV (92.22% identity) and Bat-SL-CoV (80.36% identity), forms a new clade-2 in lineage B of beta-CoV. The alignments of RBD contact residues to ACE2 justified? Those SARS-CoV-2 strains sequences were 100% identical by each other, significantly varied in RaTG13 and pangolin-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 has a polybasic cleavage site with an inserted sequence of PRRA compared to RaTG13 and only PRR to pangolin. Only serine (Ser) in pangolin and both threonine (Thr) and serine (Ser) O-linked glycans were seen in RaTG13, suggesting that a detailed study needed in pangolin (Manis javanica) and bat (Rhinolophus affinis) related CoV.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesChinaChiropteraCommunicable Disease ControlCoronavirusCoronavirus Envelope ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, ViralHost SpecificityHumansModels, MolecularPangolinsPhylogenyPolysaccharidesProtein ConformationSARS-CoV-2Coronavirus Envelope ProteinsPolysaccharidesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCOVID-19intermediate hostpangolinsRaTg13SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32633815
PMCPMC7361880
OpenAlexW3039138712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.