Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32633766›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.

Kathryn Oakland, Sandeepkumar Kothiwale, Tyler Forehand, Edmund Jackson, Cliff Bucknall, Michael S L Sey, Siddharth Singh, Vipul Jairath, Jonathan Perlin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06409988 (External Validation of the SHA2PE Score and Its Comparison to the Oakland Score for the Prediction of Safe Discharge in Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06409988 completednot on this map

External Validation of the SHA2PE Score and Its Comparison to the Oakland Score for the Prediction of Safe Discharge in Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

TypeobservationalSponsorGermans Trias i Pujol HospitalRan2014 to 2020Enrolled398ConditionsLower GI BleedingArmsSafe discharge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. External validation of the SHASurgical endoscopy · 2024
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn OaklandDepartment of Digestive Diseases, HCA Healthcare UK, London, United Kingdom.
Sandeepkumar KothiwaleDepartment of Data Science, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, Tennessee.
Tyler ForehandDepartment of Data Science, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, Tennessee.
Edmund JacksonDepartment of Data Science, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, Tennessee.
Cliff BucknallDepartment of Digestive Diseases, HCA Healthcare UK, London, United Kingdom.
Michael S L SeyDivision of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology and Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.
Vipul JairathDivision of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan PerlinDepartment of Data Science, HCA Healthcare, Nashville, Tennessee.
HCA Healthcare · USInforma Healthcare · GBWestern University · CAUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Comparative Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Therapies for Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesK23DK117058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SINGH, SIDDHARTH · 2018 to 2022
$971k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), which manifests as blood in the colon or anorectum, is a common reason for hospitalization. In most patients, LGIB stops spontaneously with no in-hospital intervention. A risk score that could identify patients at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes could help improve the triage process and allow greater numbers of patients to receive outpatient management of LGIB. Objective: To externally validate the Oakland Score, which was previously developed using a score threshold of 8 points to identify patients with LGIB who are at low risk of adverse outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter prognostic study was conducted in 140 US hospitals in the Hospital Corporation of America network. A total of 46 179 adult patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of LGIB between June 1, 2016, and October 15, 2018, were initially identified using diagnostic codes. Of those, 51 patients were excluded because they were more likely to have upper gastrointestinal bleeding, leaving a study population of 46 128 patients with LGIB. For the statistical analysis of the Oakland Score, an additional 8061 patients were excluded because they were missing data on Oakland Score components or clinical outcomes, resulting in 38 067 patients included in the analysis. The study used area under the receiver operating characteristic curves with 95% CIs for external validation of the model. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each score threshold (≤8 points, ≤9 points, and ≤10 points). Data were analyzed from October 16, 2018, to September 4, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Identification of patients who met the criteria for safe discharge from the hospital and comparison of the performance of 2 score thresholds (≤8 points vs ≤10 points). Safe discharge was defined as the absence of blood transfusion, rebleeding, hemostatic intervention, hospital readmission, and death. Results: Among 46 128 adult patients with LGIB, the mean (SD) age was 70.1 (16.5) years; 23 091 patients (50.1%) were female. Of those, 22 074 patients (47.9%) met the criteria for safe discharge from the hospital. In this group, the mean (SD) age was 67.9 (18.1) years, and 11 056 patients (50.1%) were female. In the statistical analysis of the Oakland Score, which included only the 38 067 patients with complete data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for safe discharge was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.87-0.87). An Oakland Score threshold of 8 points or lower identified 3305 patients (8.7%), with a sensitivity and specificity for safe discharge of 98.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Extension of the Oakland Score threshold to 10 points or lower identified 6770 patients (17.8%), with a sensitivity and specificity for safe discharge of 96.0% and 31.9%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the Oakland Score consistently identified patients with acute LGIB who were at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes and whose conditions could safely be managed without hospitalization. The score threshold to identify low-risk patients could be extended from 8 points or lower to 10 points or lower to allow identification of a greater proportion of low-risk patients.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesPatient DischargeAcute DiseaseAdultAgedGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentROC CurveUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32633766
PMCPMC7341175
OpenAlexW3040552320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.