Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32633137›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2021

Provider-Patient Communication on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Prep) for HIV Prevention: An Exploration of Healthcare Provider Challenges.

Kennethea Wilson, Jacob Bleasdale, Sarahmona M Przybyla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Evidence-Based Approach to Facilitating PrEP Initiation Among YMSM: The MyPEEPS Plus mHealth and E-Peer Navigation Intervention.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kennethea WilsonDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-2607
Jacob BleasdaleDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo.ORCID 0000-0002-9779-1413
Sarahmona M PrzybylaDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-7307
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Virology/Immunology CoreP30AI078498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$14.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI078498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a once-daily pill prescribed by healthcare providers to protect patients from contracting HIV. Current data suggests that a minority of healthcare providers have ever prescribed it to clinically-eligible patients. The present study employed a social ecological framework to understand the factors that influence providers' engagement in patient-centered communication regarding PrEP. Semi-structured interviews (N = 20) with physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners working in primary and specialty care practices in Western New York were thematically analyzed to understand provider-based PrEP communication challenges. Although participants never prescribed PrEP, all had clinical experience with patient populations at risk for HIV, such as people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, transgender women, and people who exchange sex for resources. Results revealed three themes affecting provider engagement in PrEP-related discussions, which emerged across three levels of the social ecological model. At the individual level, challenges affecting provider engagement in patient-centered discussions included lacking PrEP knowledge to educate and counsel patients and discomfort with prescribing PrEP based on its perceived newness. At the interpersonal level, participants expressed varying degrees of discomfort discussing HIV risk behaviors with patients. At the organizational level, providers expressed that time constraints and managing concurrent health conditions were competing clinical priorities. Findings indicate expanding implementation efforts will require multilevel interventions that target potential PrEP-adopting healthcare providers to mitigate the perceived and real challenges surrounding provider-patient communication on PrEP for HIV prevention. Practical implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesCommunicationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID32633137
PMCPMC10844925
OpenAlexW3042186278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.