Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32633073›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2020

Electrode Materials in Modern Organic Electrochemistry.

David M Heard, Alastair J J Lennox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneous Indirect Redox Electrocatalysis in Electrolyte.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrocatalytic C(spNature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrochemical Hydrogenation of Aza-Arenes Using HJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Electrooxidative Divergent Halocyclizations of Ambident Amides.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Contemporary Strategies in SmIAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Interfacial Photoelectrochemistry in Organic Synthesis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Role of Water in Modulating the FeThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M HeardUniversity of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Cantocks Close, Bristol, Avon, BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3005-8222
Alastair J J LennoxUniversity of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Cantocks Close, Bristol, Avon, BS8 1TS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-7421

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T001631/1Royal Society University Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of electrode material is critical for achieving optimal yields and selectivity in synthetic organic electrochemistry. The material imparts significant influence on the kinetics and thermodynamics of electron transfer, and frequently defines the success or failure of a transformation. Electrode processes are complex and so the choice of a material is often empirical and the underlying mechanisms and rationale for success are unknown. In this review, we aim to highlight recent instances of electrode choice where rationale is offered, which should aid future reaction development.

Indexed as

electrocatalysiselectrochemistryelectrodematerialsorganic synthesis

Identifiers

PMID32633073
PMCPMC7589451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.