Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2020
The Association Between Physician Race/Ethnicity and Patient Satisfaction: an Exploration in Direct to Consumer Telemedicine.
Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of physician and consumer demographics on AI-use penalties in primary care: a vignette-based study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Peer perceptions of clinicians using generative AI in medical decision-making.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Patient-Physician Racial and Gender Concordance on Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Clinic Visits.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Observational
- Experiences of Physicians Investigated for Professionalism Concerns: a Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Diversity among health care leaders in Canada: a cross-sectional study of perceived gender and race.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022Article
- Considerations of Bias and Reliability in Publicly Reported Physician Ratings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction measures have important implications for physicians. Patient bias against non-White physicians may impact physician satisfaction ratings, but this has not been widely studied.
objectiveTo assess differences in patient satisfaction by physician race/ethnicity.
designA cross-sectional observational study.
participantsPatients seeking care on a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine platform between July 2016 and July 2018 and their physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Patient satisfaction was ascertained immediately following the encounter on scales of 1 to 5 stars and scored two ways: (1) top-box satisfaction (5 stars versus fewer) and (2) dissatisfaction (2 or fewer stars versus 3 or more). To approximate the information patients would use to make assumptions about physician race/ethnicity, four reviewers classified physicians into categories based on physician name and photo. These included White American, Black American, South Asian, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, and East Asian. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to assess differences in patient top-box satisfaction and patient dissatisfaction by physician race/ethnicity, controlling for patient characteristics, prescription receipt, physician specialty, and whether the physician trained in the USA versus internationally. KEY
resultsThe sample included 119,016 encounters with 390 physicians. Sixty percent were White American, 14% South Asian, 7% Black American, 7% Hispanic, 6% Middle Eastern, and 6% East Asian. Encounters with South Asian physicians (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91) and East Asian physicians (aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.99) were significantly less likely than those with White American physicians to result in top-box satisfaction. Compared to encounters with White American physicians, those with Black American physicians (aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.12-2.64), South Asian physicians (aOR 1.77; 95% CI 1.23-2.56), and East Asian physicians (aOR 2.10; 95% CI 1.38-3.20) were more likely to result in patient dissatisfaction.
conclusionsIn our study, patients reported lower satisfaction with some groups of non-White American physicians, which may have implications for their compensation, professional reputation, and job satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.