Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632761›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Supportive care needs and service use during palliative care in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective longitudinal study.

Anneke Ullrich, Gabriella Marx, Corinna Bergelt, Gesine Benze, Youyou Zhang, Feline Wowretzko, Julia Heine, Lisa-Marie Dickel, Friedemann Nauck, Carsten Bokemeyer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychological distress, quality of life, needs, and resources among informal caregivers in specialist palliative home care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the lived experience of Chinese family caregivers caring for end-of-life cancer patients at home: a phenomenological study in Singapore.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneke UllrichPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany. a.ullrich@uke.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1759-4461
Gabriella MarxDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Corinna BergeltDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gesine BenzeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Youyou ZhangPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Feline WowretzkoPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia HeineDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Lisa-Marie DickelDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Friedemann NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Karin OechslePalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr, 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5183-641X
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Cancer Society of Hamburg, Germany ("Hamburger Krebsgesellschaft e.V.") no grant number assigned
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the supportive care needs of family caregivers (FCs) of advanced cancer patients and their support service use at the beginning of specialist inpatient palliative care (SIPC), near the patient's death, and during bereavement.

methodsFCs reported their needs using the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN), along with their utilization of psychosocial and bereavement support services at the beginning (N = 232) and 6-9 months after SIPC (N = 160).

resultsAt the beginning of SIPC, mean of 16.9 of 20 needs were reported to be highly important, and 12.2 were reported to be met. At the time of the patient's death, 16.8 needs were highly important, and 13.8 were met. At both time points, the highest ranked need was related to information about changes in the patient's condition (100% vs. 99%), and the most frequently unmet need was related to feeling hope (73% vs. 71%). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a low education level to be consistently related to a greater number of highly important needs. Higher satisfaction with care and better social support was related to a greater number of met needs. Twenty-five percent of FCs had accessed at least one psychosocial support service prior to SIPC, and 30% had done so during bereavement. Among non-users of support services, > 75% indicated sufficient informal support as a barrier to service use.

conclusionsThe findings offer a useful guide for adequately addressing FCs' needs in an effort to optimize FC support. However, only a subgroup of the FCs used support services. Better information and provision of tailored services might improve FCs' situations in the future.

Indexed as

Social SupportCaregiversFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareProspective StudiesTerminal CareCancerFamily caregiverNeedsPalliative careProspective studiesSupport services

Identifiers

PMID32632761
PMCPMC7843549
OpenAlexW3038596805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.