Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632698›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

The journey of the non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patient: the perspective of professionals and patients.

Teresa Otón, Carlos Sastre, Loreto Carmona

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa OtónInMusc, Madrid, Spain. teresa.oton@inmusc.eu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-7146
Carlos SastreNovartis Farmacéutica SA, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-7838
Loreto CarmonaInMusc, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-2551
Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética · ESNovartis (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExplore the perspective of patients and professionals regarding non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and to define the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment in order to identify unmet needs during the process.

methodsA qualitative study was carried out in two phases. In the first part, five focus groups were held with rheumatologists, orthopaedist, physiotherapists, primary care physicians (PCP), radiologists and six narrative interviews with nr-axSpA patients. In the second part, a nominal group meeting was held to detect which needs were not covered in the nr-axSpA (all of whom had collaborated in the previous phase).

resultsThe topics discussed with professional groups and patients were the appropriateness of the term and concept of nr-axSpA, the management of low back pain and inflammatory back pain in routine clinical practice, complementary test and the problem of waiting lists and finally the unmet needs both from a practitioner's and a patient's perspective. The final group explored solutions to the problems based on what was discussed in the first part of the project. Some of these solutions were strengthening relations between specialties, implementing high resolution consultations, rethinking the disability scales, offering better information to patients, designing resource maps and using different strategies to promote knowledge of the disease.

conclusionMany different perspectives on the same disease have revealed the difficult journey of the patient with suspected nr-axSpA, while identifying problems and solutions. Key Points • Diagnosis of nr-AxSpA among health professionals outside rheumatology may lead to numerous turns and difficulties in the patient's journey. • The impact of delays and complications in the journey to diagnosis is not quantified but directly affects the state of well-being and health of patients. • Multidisciplinary care is far from a reality. Primary care (key specialists in any chronic condition), radiologists, orthopaedists, and non-physicians such as physiotherapists and psychologists are generally excluded from dealing with these patients, and often have to do their work outside of physicians, rather than working together in a truly patient-centred medicine.

Indexed as

Low Back PainRheumatologySpondylarthritisSpondylitis, AnkylosingHumansRheumatologistsNon-radiographic axial spondyloarthritisPatient’s journeyQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID32632698
OpenAlexW3039345928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.