Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632640›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Development and reliability of the AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma): a tool to evaluate and predict outcomes from clinician's perspective.

Said Sadiqi, Sander P J Muijs, Jeroen J M Renkens, Marcel W Post, Lorin M Benneker, Jens R Chapman, Frank Kandziora, Klaus J Schnake, Emiliano N Vialle, Alexander R Vaccaro and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Health professionals' perspective on the applicability of AO Spine PROST (patient reported outcome Spine trauma) in people with a motor-complete traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Said SadiqiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP G05.228, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.sadiqi-3@umcutrecht.nl.
Sander P J MuijsDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP G05.228, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J M RenkensDepartment of Orthopaedics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel W PostRehabilitation Center 'De Hoogstraat', Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lorin M BennekerDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jens R ChapmanSwedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Frank KandzioraCenter for Spinal Surgery, BGU-Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Klaus J SchnakeCenter for Spinal Surgery, Schön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
Emiliano N VialleCajuru Hospital, Catholic University of Parana, Caritiba, Brazil.
Alexander R VaccaroDepartment of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
F Cumhur OnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, HP G05.228, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on the development of AOSpine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) and results of an initial reliability study.

methodsThe AOSpine CROST was developed using an iterative approach of multiple cycles of development, review, and revision including an expert clinician panel. Subsequently, a reliability study was performed among an expert panel who were provided with 20 spine trauma cases, administered twice with 4-week interval. The results of the developmental process were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the reliability per parameter using Kappa statistics, inter-rater rater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and internal consistency using Cronbach's α.

resultsThe AOSpine CROST was developed and consisted of 10 parameters, 2 of which are only applicable for surgically treated patents ('Wound healing' and 'Implants'). A dichotomous scoring system ('yes' or 'no' response) was incorporated to express expected problems for the short term and long term. In the reliability study, 16 (84.2%) participated in the first round and 14 (73.7%) in the second. Intra-rater reliability was fair to good for both time points (κ = 0.40-0.80 and κ = 0.31-0.67). Results of inter-rater reliability were lower (κ = 0.18-0.60 and κ = 0.16-0.46). Inter-rater agreement for total scores showed moderate results (ICC = 0.52-0.60), and the internal consistency was acceptable (α = 0.76-0.82).

conclusionsThe AOSpine CROST, an outcome tool for the surgeons, was developed using an iterative process. An initial reliability analysis showed fair to moderate results and acceptable internal consistency. Further clinical validation studies will be performed to further validate the tool.

Indexed as

Spinal InjuriesSurgeonsHumansObserver VariationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReproducibility of ResultsAOSpine CROSTClinical parametersClinician perspectiveOutcome instrumentRadiological parametersSpine trauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.