ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
High-risk features in primary versus secondary enucleated globes with advanced retinoblastoma: a retrospective histopathological study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe management of bilateral advanced retinoblastoma (RB) cases is challenging with attempts to use neoadjuvant therapy salvaging of one of the globes. Our aim in this study was to demonstrate the effect of this primary therapy on the histopathological features and risk factors in secondary enucleated compared to primarily enucleated globes with groups D and E RB.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all enucleated globes with advanced RB received in the pathology laboratories over a period of 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: one with primary enucleations and another with at least one secondary enucleated globe, and their demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The enucleated globes in the two groups were analyzed to compare the general histopathological features including tumor seeding, size, differentiation, growth pattern, mitotic figures, and focality. More importantly, high-risk features: choroidal invasion, optic nerve (ON) invasion, iris/anterior chamber invasion, ciliary body invasion, and scleral and extra-scleral extension, as well as the pathological classification of the tumor (pT) according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition were also compared between the two groups.
resultsWe had a total of 106 enucleated globes (78 primary and 28 secondary enucleations) from 99 patients with advanced RB (73 patients with primarily and 26 with secondarily enucleated globes). Demographic and clinical profiles of patients were similar in both, but the mean interval from presentation to enucleation was significantly longer in the secondary enucleations (P = 0.015). Rare/occasional mitotic figures were observed in secondary enucleations using multivariate analysis (P = 0.003). Primarily enucleated globes had higher risk of tumor seeding (P = 0.020), post-laminar/surgical margin ON invasion (P = 0.001), and massive choroidal invasion (P = 0.028). Half of the secondary enucleated globes had tumors confined to the globes without invasion (pT1) and statistically significant lower tumor classifications (pT1 or pT2a) compared to primary enucleations (P =0.001). However, 18% of the secondarily enucleated globes in 3 patients had unfavorable outcome with RB-related mortality after a period of 1-4 years.
conclusionsSecondary enucleated globes with advanced RB show favorable histopathological findings mainly less mitosis. These eyes have significantly lower chance for harboring choroidal and ON invasion, thus mostly classified as pT1 or pT2a when compared to primarily enucleated globes. The decision for secondary enucleation was observed to be significantly delayed (8.0 months ± 9.8). Prompt decision for needed enucleation based on the response to primary treatment and careful histopathological examination of enucleated globes are essential to prevent disease-related mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.