Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632605›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2020

Conventional Treatment of Glioblastoma Reveals Persistent CD44

Johann Mar Gudbergsson, Esben Christensen, Serhii Kostrikov, Torben Moos, Meg Duroux, Andreas Kjær, Kasper Bendix Johnsen, Thomas Lars Andresen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johann Mar GudbergssonNeurobiology Research & Drug Delivery, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 3B, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. jmg@hst.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-009X
Esben ChristensenCenter for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 423, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Serhii KostrikovCenter for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 423, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Torben MoosNeurobiology Research & Drug Delivery, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 3B, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Meg DurouxMolecular Pharmacology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andreas KjærCluster for Molecular Imaging, Department for Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper Bendix JohnsenCenter for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 423, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. kasjoh@dtu.dk.
Thomas Lars AndresenCenter for Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 423, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKAalborg University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Lundbeckfonden R155-2013-14113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and devastating primary tumor of the central nervous system with a median survival of 12 to 15 months after diagnosis. GBM is highly difficult to treat due to its delicate location, inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and high plasticity in response to treatment. In this study, we intracranially implanted primary GBM cells into mice which underwent conventional GBM treatments, including irradiation, temozolomide, and a combination. We obtained single cell suspensions through a combination of mechanical and enzymatic dissociation of brain tissue and investigated in detail the changes in GBM cells in response to conventional treatments in vivo using multi-color flow cytometry and cluster analysis. CD44 expression was elevated in all treatment groups, which was confirmed by subsequent immunohistochemistry. High CD44 expression was furthermore shown to correlate with poor prognosis of GBM and low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. Together, these results indicate a key role for CD44 in glioma pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDisease ProgressionGlioblastomaHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicePrognosisTemozolomideTumor BurdenUp-RegulationHyaluronan ReceptorsTemozolomideCancerCD133CD44GlioblastomaPlasticityPopulationResistanceStem cellsSubpopulationTreatmentTumor

Identifiers

PMID32632605
OpenAlexW3038172163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.