Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632597›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2020

Neural patterns during anticipation predict emotion regulation success for reappraisal.

Elektra Schubert, James A Agathos, Maja Brydevall, Daniel Feuerriegel, Peter Koval, Carmen Morawetz, Stefan Bode

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elektra SchubertMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
James A AgathosMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Maja BrydevallMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Daniel FeuerriegelMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Peter KovalMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Carmen MorawetzCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Stefan BodeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia. sbode@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to exert control over emotions, termed emotion regulation (ER), is vital for everyday functioning. ER success may be influenced by processes relating to the anticipation (prior to active regulation) and implementation (during active regulation) of ER strategy use. We investigated whether brain activity patterns recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) during the first second of anticipation and implementation of two ER strategies-distraction and reappraisal-were related to regulation success. Participants viewed negative images that evoked disgust and sadness. Before each image was presented, participants were cued to either passively view the image or decrease their emotional responses. ER success scores were calculated from subsequent self-reported disgust and sadness ratings. Using multivariate support vector regression, ER success scores were predicted from spatiotemporal patterns of event-related potentials during the first second of anticipation and implementation phases of each ER strategy. For both sadness and disgust, reappraisal success could be predicted during anticipation, while distraction success could be predicted during implementation. These findings suggest that early anticipatory cognitive processes are a key determinant of reappraisal success, but may not be similarly important for distraction. This may be because reappraisal is more cognitively demanding than distraction, requiring enhanced preparation of mental resources.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalAttentionCuesDisgustElectroencephalographyEmotional RegulationEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePattern Recognition, VisualSadnessYoung AdultAnticipationElectroencephalography (EEG)Emotion regulationMultivariate pattern analysis (MVPA)Regulation success

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.