ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021
Robotic surgery vs. open surgery for thymectomy, a retrospective case-match study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05262582 (Randomized Open Label Two Arms Cohort Study to Evaluate Curative Effect and Quality of Life of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Open Label Two Arms Cohort Study to Evaluate Curative Effect and Quality of Life of Single Port and Two Ports Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymectomy
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-assisted versus open thymectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matched studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Robotic thymectomy in myasthenia gravis: current evidence, outcomes, and future perspective.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Optimizing Diagnosis and Surgery for Pure Anterior Mediastinal Cysts: Insights from a Single-Centre Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic emergency general surgery, future or fallacy?: case-matched comparison of operative and clinical outcomes during the adoption phase in a tertiary centre.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in pediatric surgical oncology: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The robotic approach in the treatment of thymus diseases has been described in many papers, but few studies have compared the early outcome of patients after robotic and open transsternal procedure. Our study aims to confirm the non-inferiority of the robotic technique in terms of feasibility, safety and postoperative patient recovery compared to the open standard. This is a retrospective cohort study in which we compare 114 patients who underwent thymectomy for a thymus disease at our thoracic surgery unit. Our robotic surgery programme started in February 2012 with the treatment of mediastinal diseases. Since then, we have performed 57 robotic thymectomies (Group A). This series was compared with 57 patients who underwent open thymectomies (Group B) performed before 2012, and all were properly matched through a propensity score. Hospital and ICU stay, postoperative pain, use of painkillers, operative time and complications rate were analysed. Postoperative pain, evaluated through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group (p < 0.001), which was associated with a trend to lower use of painkillers in Group A, although it was not significant (p = 0.06). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in terms of ICU stay (p = 0.080), although the total hospital stay was significantly longer in Group B (p = 0.003). No statistical differences were observed in operative time (p = 0.492) and complications rate (p = 0.950). The robotic-assisted technique showed the same operative time and complications rate compared with open surgery, thereby confirming its safety and feasibility in myasthenic patients as well as in Masaoka I-II thymomas. The lower postoperative pain and the shorter hospital stay associated with prompt mobilisation and faster chest drainage removal showed the great advantage of the minimally invasive robotic approach in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.