ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021
Advance of antithrombotic treatment in patients with cerebral microbleed.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic kidney disease as a catalyst for cerebral microbleeds: understanding the underlying mechanisms and treatment approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Nomogram based on clinical and brain computed tomography characteristics for predicting more than 5 cerebral microbleeds in the hypertensive population.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Prediction of Hemorrhagic Transformation after Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Profile of natural anticoagulant, coagulant factor and anti-phospholipid antibody in critically ill COVID-19 patients.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the elder proportion increasing and the antithrombotic agents widely using as well as the newly magnetic resonance imaging sequence emerging, the detection rate of cerebral microbleed (CMB) is gradually raising in recent years. As we all know that CMB mainly reflects the severity of deeply small vessel lesions, which predicts hemorrhagic transformation. Whereby, to some patients with both CMB and remarkable antithrombotic indication, treatment becomes a dilemma. We have to face the challenge of weighing the pros and cons of both drug indication and bleeding risk when making a proper decision for patients. This study summarized recent advance on CMB diagnosis and treatment, to provide a useful reference to physicians in their clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32632557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.