Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632466›Full record

SynthesisStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Impact of intracavitary brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcomes of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yeon Joo Kim, Hyun-Cheol Kang, Young Seok Kim

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Point-A vs. volume-based brachytherapy for the treatment of cervix cancer: A meta-analysis.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Long-Term Efficacy and Toxicity of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Bulky Cervical Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yeon Joo KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, 05505, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Hyun-Cheol KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Young Seok KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, 05505, Seoul, Korea (Republic of). ysk@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-4476
Ulsan College · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of brachytherapy (BT) technique (two-dimensional [2D] or three-dimensional image-guided [3D]) on outcomes of cervical cancer patients.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to April 16, 2019, for studies which evaluated the effect of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT in cervical cancer. Endpoints included cumulative incidence of severe toxicity, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled in the meta-analysis using the random-effects model.

resultsSix studies of eight cohorts were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled HR regarding toxicity was evaluated in five cohorts in three studies, and the HR of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.77). All six studies were included for the synthesis for LRRFS, and the pooled HR favors 3D-BT (0.61 [95% CI 0.40-0.93]). For PFS, three studies were included for analysis and 3D-BT was superior to 2D-BT (HR = 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.96]). Five studies were included for the pooled HR regarding OS, and pooled HR of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.40-1.06).

conclusion3D-BT might reduce severe toxicity and improve LRRFS and PFS in patients with cervical cancer. 3D-BT should be considered for standard management of cervical cancer, and efforts for adopting this procedure in Korea should be pursued.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSurvival AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsIntracavityRadiotherapySurvivalToxicityUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32632466
OpenAlexW3039744824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.