ArticleComputing in cardiology2019
Does Alignment in Statistical Shape Modeling of Left Atrium Appendage Impact Stroke Prediction?
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging 3D Atrial Geometry for the Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- On preserving anatomical detail in statistical shape analysis for clustering: focus on left atrial appendage morphology.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- All Roads Lead to Rome: Diverse Etiologies of Tricuspid Regurgitation Create a Predictable Constellation of Right Ventricular Shape Changes.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence suggests that the shape of left atrium appendages (LAA) is a primary indicator in predicting stroke for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). Statistical shape modeling tools used to represent (i.e., parameterize) the underlying LAA variability are of crucial importance to learn shape-based predictors of stroke. Most shape modeling techniques use some form of alignment either as a data pre-processing step or during the modeling step. However, the LAA is a joint anatomy along with left atrium (LA), and the relative position and alignment plays a crucial part in determining risk of stroke. In this paper, we explore different alignment strategies for statistical shape modeling and how each strategy affects the stroke prediction capability. This allows for identifying a unified approach of alignment while analyzing the LAA anatomy for stroke. Here, we study three different alignment strategies, (i) global alignment, (ii) global translational alignment and (iii) cluster based alignment. Our results show that alignment strategies that take into account LAA orientation, i.e., (ii), or the inherent natural clustering of the population under study, i.e., (iii), provide significant improvement over global alignment in both qualitative as well as quantitative measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.