ReviewmHealth2020
Telepsychiatry and integrated primary care: setting expectations and creating an effective process for success.
Review in mHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The importance of group experience during adolescence and beyond: pathways from trauma to growth.American journal of psychoanalysis · 2025Article
- Telepsychiatry, access, and equity: accelerating mental health care for rural and low-income youth.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Primary care and mental health: Where do we go from here?World journal of psychiatry · 2021Review
- Acceptance of Supportive Illustrations for Preparation of Patients for an Orthopedic Telemedical Consultation.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Virtual ARCP assessment and trainee feedback meetings: facilitating the best experience and practice.The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2020Review
- The Role of Telemental Health, Tele-consultation, and Tele-supervision in Post-disaster and Low-resource Settings.Current psychiatry reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telepsychiatry, especially in the form of live interactive videoconferencing, has greatly advanced the availability and use of specialist psychiatric consultations in primary care settings. Nevertheless, reliance on telepsychiatry, with corresponding decreases in direct face-to-face interaction between primary care providers and psychiatrists, can create unique challenges such as reducing the availability of non-verbal cues, and preventing the informal interactions that are so necessary for clarifying clinical and process details and for building essential team-based trust and rapport. Written from the perspective of an integrated psychiatrist, this article offers recommendations for a formal process to optimize virtual care coordination by setting clear expectations and providing communication tools for an effective and efficient telepsychiatry enabled integrated service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.