Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632334›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2020

Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain.

Kieran C R Fox, Lin Shi, Sori Baek, Omri Raccah, Brett L Foster, Srijani Saha, Daniel S Margulies, Aaron Kucyi, Josef Parvizi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Association of Bidirectional Network Cores in the Brain with Perceptual Awareness and Cognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kieran C R Fox *Stanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. kcrfox@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6923-4580
Lin Shi *Stanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-6649
Sori BaekStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-0833
Omri RaccahStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3393-581X
Brett L FosterDepartments of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-5574
Srijani SahaStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Daniel S MarguliesCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 7225, Frontlab, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France.
Aaron KucyiStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-0028
Josef ParviziStanford Human Intracranial Cognitive Electrophysiology Program, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jparvizi@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-7948
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCapital Medical University · CNCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Sensory Reinstatement in Human NeocortexR01MH116914 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FOSTER, BRETT · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Spatiotemporal investigations of parietal cortex contributions to episodic memoryR00MH103479 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FOSTER, BRETT · 2016 to 2018
$747k
CIHRNIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH103479NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) of the human brain has long been known to elicit a remarkable variety of perceptual, motor and cognitive effects, but the functional-anatomical basis of this heterogeneity remains poorly understood. We conducted a whole-brain mapping of iES-elicited effects, collecting first-person reports following iES at 1,537 cortical sites in 67 participants implanted with intracranial electrodes. We found that intrinsic network membership and the principal gradient of functional connectivity strongly predicted the type and frequency of iES-elicited effects in a given brain region. While iES in unimodal brain networks at the base of the cortical hierarchy elicited frequent and simple effects, effects became increasingly rare, heterogeneous and complex in heteromodal and transmodal networks higher in the hierarchy. Our study provides a comprehensive exploration of the relationship between the hierarchical organization of intrinsic functional networks and the causal modulation of human behaviour and experience with iES.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexConnectomeDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectric StimulationElectrocorticographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID32632334
PMCPMC7572705
OpenAlexW3039362686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.