Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632196›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Histological assessment of optogenetic tools to study fronto-visual and fronto-parietal cortical networks in the rhesus macaque.

Michal G Fortuna, Janina Hüer, Hao Guo, Jens Gruber, Eva Gruber-Dujardin, Jochen F Staiger, Hansjörg Scherberger, Stefan Treue, Alexander Gail

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pathway-selective optogenetics reveals the functional anatomy of top-down attentional modulation in the macaque visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Optogenetics in primate cortical networks.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal G Fortuna *Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. mfortuna@dpz.eu.
Janina Hüer *Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. jhueer@dpz.eu.
Hao GuoCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens GruberPrimate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Eva Gruber-DujardinPathology Unit, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Jochen F StaigerInstitute for Neuroanatomy, University Medical Center, University of Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Hansjörg ScherbergerNeurobiology Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan Treue *Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander Gail *Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
German Primate Center · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics offers unprecedented possibilities to investigate cortical networks. Yet, the number of successful optogenetic applications in non-human primates is still low, and the consequences of opsin expression in the primate brain are not well documented. We assessed histologically if we can target cerebrocortical networks with three common optogenetic constructs (AAV2/5-CaMKIIα-eNpHR3.0-mCherry, -ChR2-eYFP, -C1V1-mCherry). The frontal eye field or the dorsal premotor area of rhesus macaques were virally injected, and the resulting transduction spread, expression specificity, and opsin trafficking into axons projecting to parietal and visual areas were examined. After variable periods (2-24 months), expression was robust for all constructs at the injection sites. The CaMKIIα promoter driven-expression was predominant, but not exclusive, in excitatory neurons. In the case of eNpHR3.0-mCherry and ChR2-eYFP, opsins were present in axonal projections to target areas, in which sparse, retrogradely transduced neurons could also be found. Finally, the intracellular distribution of opsins differed: ChR2-eYFP had almost exclusive membrane localization, while eNpHR3.0-mCherry and C1V1-mCherry showed additional intracellular accumulations, which might affect neuronal survival in the long-term. Results indicate that all three constructs can be used for local neuronal modulation, but axonal stimulation and long-term use require additional considerations of construct selection and verification.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexFrontal LobeLuminescent ProteinsMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve NetOpsinsOptogeneticsParietal LobeVisual CortexLuminescent ProteinsOpsins

Identifiers

PMID32632196
PMCPMC7338380
OpenAlexW3038210189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.