Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32632153›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Pre-clinical study of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells for Parkinson's disease.

Daisuke Doi, Hiroaki Magotani, Tetsuhiro Kikuchi, Megumi Ikeda, Satoe Hiramatsu, Kenji Yoshida, Naoki Amano, Masaki Nomura, Masafumi Umekage, Asuka Morizane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daisuke DoiDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-1220
Hiroaki MagotaniDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tetsuhiro KikuchiDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-4967
Megumi IkedaDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-3156
Satoe HiramatsuDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenji YoshidaDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki AmanoFacility for iPS Cell Therapy, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masaki NomuraFacility for iPS Cell Therapy, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masafumi UmekageFacility for iPS Cell Therapy, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Asuka MorizaneDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. jbtaka@cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-9186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived dopaminergic (DA) neurons are an expected source for cell-based therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD). The regulatory criteria for the clinical application of these therapies, however, have not been established. Here we show the results of our pre-clinical study, in which we evaluate the safety and efficacy of dopaminergic progenitors (DAPs) derived from a clinical-grade human iPSC line. We confirm the characteristics of DAPs by in vitro analyses. We also verify that the DAP population include no residual undifferentiated iPSCs or early neural stem cells and have no genetic aberration in cancer-related genes. Furthermore, in vivo studies using immunodeficient mice reveal no tumorigenicity or toxicity of the cells. When the DAPs are transplanted into the striatum of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, the animals show behavioral improvement. Based on these results, we started a clinical trial to treat PD patients in 2018.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineDisease Models, AnimalDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMacaca fascicularisMaleMice, Inbred NODMice, KnockoutMice, SCIDNeural Stem CellsOutcome Assessment, Health CareParkinson DiseaseDopamine

Identifiers

PMID32632153
PMCPMC7338530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.