ArticleThorax2020
Maintenance inhaler therapy preferences of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in Thorax, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.The patient · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroid use in asthma: a systematic review.BMJ open respiratory research · 2020Pooled it
- Patient Preferences for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Treatments: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment Study in the USA.The patient · 2026Article
- Attributes and levels in discrete choice experiments for pharmacy services: A systematic review to inform asthma intervention design.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Review
- The role of environmental impact in healthcare providers' choices of inhalers for treatment of asthma and COPD: a discrete choice experiment.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- The environmental impact of inhaled therapy: making informed treatment choices.The European respiratory journal · 2022Review
- Suboptimal Control of Asthma Among Diverse Patients: A US Mixed Methods Focus Group Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
- Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences.The patient · 2021Article
- Patient Preferences of Low-Dose Aspirin for Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Italy: A Latent Class Analysis.The patient · 2021Article
- Impact of health technology assessment on prescribing patterns of inhaled fixed-dose combination triple therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Journal of market access & health policy · 2021Article
- Switching Inhalers: A Practical Approach to Keep on UR RADAR.Pulmonary therapy · 2020Article
- Expert Opinion and Evidence-Based Review on Maintenance Therapy Step-Down in Patients With Severe Asthma Controlled With Biologics.Open respiratory archivesArticle
- Treatment preferences in relation to fatigue of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A discrete choice experiment.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA variety of maintenance inhaler therapies are available to treat asthma and COPD. Patient-centric treatment choices require understanding patient preferences for the alternative therapies.
methodsA self-completed web-based discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit patient preferences for inhaler device and medication attributes. Selection of attributes was informed by patient focus groups and literature review.
resultsThe discrete choice experiment was completed by 810 patients with asthma and 1147 patients with COPD. Patients with asthma most valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min, followed by reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Patients with COPD most and equally valued decreasing the onset of action from 30 to 5 min and reducing yearly exacerbations from 3 to 1. Both patients with asthma and patients with COPD were willing to accept an additional exacerbation in exchange for a 15 min decrease in onset of action and a longer onset of action in exchange for a lower risk of adverse effects from inhaled corticosteroids. Patients with asthma and COPD valued once-daily over twice-daily dosing, pressurised inhalers over dry powder inhalers and non-capsule priming over single-use capsules, although these attributes were not valued as highly as faster onset of action or reduced exacerbations.
conclusionsThe most important maintenance inhaler attributes for patients with asthma and COPD were fast onset of symptom relief and a lower rate of exacerbations. Concerns about safety of inhaled corticosteroids and device convenience also affected patient preferences but were less important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.